{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["Sheet1"],"not_rendered":{"defined_names":1},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Sheet1","index":0,"n_rows":65,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":65,"merged":[[0,0,0,4],[1,0,1,4],[2,0,2,4],[4,1,4,3],[9,1,9,3],[10,1,10,3],[15,1,15,3],[16,1,16,3],[20,1,20,3],[21,1,21,3],[25,1,25,3],[26,1,26,3],[30,1,30,3],[31,1,31,3],[35,1,35,3],[36,1,36,3],[41,1,41,3],[42,1,42,3],[46,1,46,3],[47,1,47,3],[52,1,52,3],[53,1,53,3],[57,1,57,3],[58,3,58,4],[59,3,59,4]]}
["Forest Assessment Checklist -- Ecosystem-Level Urban Forest Analysis"]
["Site Name/Description (Protected Natural Area, Unprotected Natural Area, Wetland Mitigation Area, etc.)"]
[]
["#","Criteria","Vegetation Resource - Performance Indicators","Scale ","Score"]
[1,"Habitat Diversity",null,null,0]
[null,"Excellent","Two or more vegetative communities on site AND presence of ecotone or significant physiographic variability",3]
[null,"Good","Two vegetative communities on site; no ecotone; possible presence of significant physiographic variability",2]
[null,"Fair","One vegetative community on site; low physiographic variability",1]
[null,"Poor","Exotic monoculture; little or no native vegetation",0]
[null,"Vegetative Communities Present: "]
[2,"Structural Diversity",null,null,0]
[null,"Excellent","Vegetative strata intact; few signs of stress or disease; healthy regeneration; high occurrence of indicator species",3]
[null,"Good","Vegetative strata intact but shows signs of stress or disease; little regeneration; moderate occurrence of indicator species",2]
[null,"Fair","Vegetative strata not well defined with signs of stress or disease; little regeneration; low occurrence of indicator species",1]
[null,"Poor","Vegetative strata completely stressed and/or overtaken by exotic species; no occurrence of indicator species",0]
[null,"Comments:"]
[3,"Successional Status",null,null,0]
[null,"Good","Good representative of the historic vegetative communities through all strata; regeneration present",3]
[null,"Fair","Represents significant deviation from the native vegetative communities due to lack represents a substantial degradation from the native vegetative communities; no viable and significant regeneration observed viable regeneration or driving mechanisms (e.g., fire suppression, substantial changes in hydrological regime)",2]
[null,"Poor","Represents a substantial degradation from the native vegetative communities; no viable and significant regeneration observed",1]
[null,"Comments:"]
[4,"Presence of Protected Plant Species",null,null,0]
[null,"Good","Significant populations of listed species observed or reported present",2]
[null,"Fair","Significant populations possible due to habitat present",1]
[null,"Poor","No species observed or reported and habitat not conducive to significant populations",0]
[null,"Listed Plant Species Present:"]
[5,"Presence of Protected Animal Species",null,null,0]
[null,"Good","Observed, documented, or expected frequent use or nesting",2]
[null,"Fair","Potential or occasional use but not conducive to nesting",1]
[null,"Poor","Habitat not conducive to use, no protected species habitat",0]
[null,"Listed Animal Species Present:"]
[6,"Wildlife Utilization",null,null,0]
[null,"Good","High evidence of wildlife utilization, with abundant food source, cover, and habitat diversity",2]
[null,"Fair","Moderate evidence of wildlife utilization, with moderate food source, cover, and habitat diversity       ",1]
[null,"Poor","Low or no evidence of wildlife utilization, with non-sufficient food source, cover, and habitat diversity  ",0]
[null,"Wildlife Evidence Noted:"]
[7,"Presence of Nuisance Exotic Vegetative Species",null,null,0]
[null,"Excellent","Less than 10% exotic species cover",4]
[null,"Good","11 to 25% exotic species cover",3]
[null,"Fair","26 to 75% exotic species cover",2]
[null,"Poor","More than 75% exotic species cover",1]
[null,"Exotics Present:"]
[8,"Connectivity",null,null,0]
[null,"Good ","High potential for connectivity to other green areas (parks, ESL’s, golf course, agricultural fields, conservation easements, etc.): adjacent to green areas or connected through greenways",2]
[null,"Fair","Moderate potential for connectivity to other green areas (parks, ESL’s, golf course, agricultural fields, conservation easements, etc.): could be connected if other potential sites are acquired or greenways developed; or major protected species has potential to use the site in a metapopulation dynamics fashion (e.g. scrub jay)",1]
[null,"Poor","Low potential for connectivity to other green areas (parks, ESL’s, golf course, agricultural fields, conservation easements, etc.): no green areas nearby; presence of major disruptions (e.g., highway) between the site and other green areas",0]
[null,"Connectivity Opportunities:"]
[9,"Tree Health",null,null,0]
[null,"Excellent","More than 75% of trees rated as excellent health condition",4]
[null,"Good","50%-75% of trees rated as excellent health condition",3]
[null,"Fair","25%-50% of trees rated as excellent health condition",2]
[null,"Poor","Less than 25% of trees rated as excellent health condition",1]
[null,"Comments:"]
[10,"Comprehensive Assessment",null,null,0]
[null,"Good","Good representative of native Florida ecosystem; high quality ecosystem at least in part (e.g. only a tract may be intact and the assessment is meant to call attention to that fine tract)",2]
[null,"Fair","Fair example of native Florida ecosystem; portions of the site are disturbed but indicator species are present; or very disturbed but rare species present",1]
[null,"Poor","Poor example of native Florida ecosystem; the site has been cleared; or any human activity has caused or is resulting in ecological degradation to the extent that the site no longer possesses the character of the native ecosystem",0]
[null,"Comments:"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Total Score"]
[{"$nulls":3},{"$f":"SUM(E5+E11+E17+E22+E27+E32+E54+E37+E43+E48)","v":0}]
[]
[{"$nulls":3},"Excellent",27]
[{"$nulls":3},"Good","23-26"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Fair ","13 - 22"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Poor","3 - 13"]