{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["Sheet1"],"not_rendered":{"defined_names":1},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Sheet1","index":0,"n_rows":94,"n_cols":4,"rows_kept":94,"merged":[[0,0,0,4],[1,0,1,4],[2,0,2,4],[4,0,4,2],[9,0,9,2],[10,0,10,2],[15,0,15,2],[16,0,16,2],[21,0,21,2],[22,0,22,2],[27,0,27,2],[28,0,28,2],[33,0,33,2],[34,0,34,2],[39,0,39,2],[40,0,40,2],[45,0,45,2],[46,0,46,2],[51,0,51,2],[52,0,52,2],[57,0,57,2],[58,0,58,2],[63,0,63,2],[64,0,64,2],[69,0,69,2],[70,0,70,2],[75,0,75,2],[76,0,76,2],[81,0,81,2],[82,0,82,2],[87,0,87,2],[88,2,88,3],[89,2,89,3]]}
["Forest Assessment Checklist -- Landscape-Level Urban Forest Analysis"]
["Site Description (Commercial Parking Lot, Residential Community, Portion of Road Right-of-Way, etc.)"]
[]
["Criteria","Vegetation Resource - Performance Indicators","Scale ","Score"]
["1. Canopy Cover Goals",null,null,0]
["Excellent","The existing canopy cover equals 75%-100% of the goal",4]
["Good","The existing canopy cover equals 50%-75% of the goal",3]
["Fair","the existing canopy cover equals 25%-50% of the goal",2]
["Poor","the existing canopy cover equals 0%-25% of the goal",1]
["Comments:"]
["2. Diversity of Tree Sizes",null,null,0]
["Excellent","25% of the tree population is in each of four RDBH classes",4]
["Good","No RDBH class represents more than 50% of the tree population",3]
["Fair","Any RDBH class represents  50% to 75% of the tree population",2]
["Poor","Any relative DBH class represents > 75% of the tree population",1]
["Comments:"]
["3. Species Suitability for Climate Zone",null,null,0]
["Excellent","All trees are of species suitable for Broward County (BC) USDA-10b",4]
["Good","More than 75% of trees are of species considered suitable for BC",3]
["Fair","50%-75% of trees are of species considered suitable for BC",2]
["Poor","Less than 50% of trees are of species considered suitable for BC",1]
["Comments:"]
["4. Tree Health - Environmental Stress",null,null,0]
["Excellent","Greater than 75% of trees rated as excellent health condition",4]
["Good","50%-75% of trees rated as excellent health condition",3]
["Fair","25%-50% of trees rated as excellent health condition",2]
["Poor","Less than 25% of trees rated as excellent health condition",1]
["Comments:"]
["5. Tree Health -- Human Stress",null,null,0]
["Excellent","Greater than 75% of trees rated as excellent health condition",4]
["Good","50%-75% of trees rated as excellent health condition",3]
["Fair","25%-50% of trees rated as excellent health condition",2]
["Poor","Less than 25% of trees rated as excellent health condition",1]
["Comments:"]
["6. Tree Health -- Insect Damage ",null,null,0]
["Excellent","Greater than 75% of trees rated as excellent health condition",4]
["Good","50%-75% of trees rated as excellent health condition",3]
["Fair","25%-50% of trees rated as excellent health condition",2]
["Poor","Less than 25% of trees rated as excellent health condition",1]
["Comments:"]
["7. Tree Health -- Disease Damage",null,null,0]
["Excellent","> 75% of trees rated as excellent health condition",4]
["Good","50%-75% of trees rated as excellent health condition",3]
["Fair","25%-50% of trees rated as excellent health condition",2]
["Poor","Less than 25% of trees rated as excellent health condition",1]
["Comments:"]
["8. Tree Health -- Adequate Root Zone",null,null,0]
["Excellent","> 75% of trees have adequate root zone",4]
["Good","50%-75% of trees have adequate root zone",3]
["Fair","25%-50% of trees have adequate root zone",2]
["Poor","Less than 25% of trees have adequate root zone",1]
["Comments:"]
["9. Wind Resistance of Tree Species",null,null,0]
["Excellent","> 75% of trees are rated on highest category of wind resistance",4]
["Good","75% of trees rated in high category of wind resistance",3]
["Fair","50% of trees rated in moderate category of wind resistance",2]
["Poor","75% of trees rated in lowest category of wind resistance",1]
["Comments:"]
["10. Diversity of Tree Species",null,null,0]
["Excellent","No tree species represent more than 10% of the tree population",4]
["Good","No tree species represent more than 20% of the tree population",3]
["Fair","No tree species represent more than 40% of the tree population",2]
["Poor","One tree species represents more than 50% of the tree population",1]
["Comments:"]
["11. Tree Species Longevity",null,null,0]
["Excellent","More than 75% of trees are of species considered long-lived for BC",4]
["Good","50%-75% of trees are of species considered long-lived for BC",3]
["Fair","25%-50% of trees are of species considered long-lived for BC",2]
["Poor","Less than 25% of trees are of species considered long-lived for BC",1]
["Comments:"]
["12. Tree Site Suitability",null,null,0]
["Excellent","Right tree Right Place with vision for the future",4]
["Good","Right tree Right Place",3]
["Fair","Guidelines were considered for the selection of suitable species",2]
["Poor","Tree species were considered in planting site selections",1]
["Comments:"]
["13. Nuisance Exotic Vegetation Management",null,null,0]
["Excellent","No trees impacted by nuisance exotic vegetation",4]
["Good","<10% impacted by nuisance exotic vegetation",3]
["Fair","25% -10% impacted by nuisance exotic vegetation",2]
["Poor","> 25% of trees impacted by nuisance exotic vegetation",1]
["Comments:"]
["14. Canopy heterogeneity ",null,null,0]
["Excellent","Canopy is not uniform, has emergents and understory species",4]
["Good","Canopy is uniform only in small patches, has emergents & understory",3]
["Fair","Canopy is uniform throughout (present or absent) or in large patches",2]
["Poor","Canopy is completely uniform or entirely absent",1]
["Comments:"]
[null,null,"TOTAL"]
[null,null,{"$f":"SUM(D83+D77+D71+D65+D59+D53+D47+D41+D35+D29+D23+D17+D11+D5)","v":0}]
[null,null,"Excellent",52]
[null,null,"Good","39 - 51"]
[null,null,"Fair ","26 - 38"]
[null,null,"Poor","13 - 25 "]